Mari Luz Congosto<\/span><\/a>
Universidad Carlos III de Madrid –HISMEDI Project<\/span><\/a><\/h4>\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n
From black and white\u2026<\/strong><\/h3>\n\n\n\nForty-four years passed between the interment of Franco on 23 November 1975 and his exhumation on 24 October 2019. In Spanish society, a range of feelings have been expressed about the final location of the person who was dictator for four long decades. His death and burial in the Valle de los Ca\u00eddos (Valley of the Fallen) had a strong impact in the media and in society that was almost paralysing. This was due more to the political consequences Franco\u2019s death would have than to the formal procedure of his funeral. The ceremony within the basilica, which culminated with the placing of a slab engraved with his name and the obligatory protocol, was accompanied outside by Falangists, traditionalists, ex-prisoners, provisional second lieutenants, Legionnaire knights, brotherhoods of fighters, Portuguese Viriatos<\/em> and members of the Portuguese secret police (PIDE), Romanian iron guards, Croatians, Italian fascists and German neo-Nazis, in a multicolour landscape of blue, black and brown shirts adorned with the medals of Mussolini, Hitler, Salazar and Franco. The monument erected under the direction of Franco with the labour of Republican political prisoners already fulfilled the purpose for which it had been constructed. It housed the embalmed body of Francisco Franco, Caudillo de Espa\u00f1a por la Gracia de Dios <\/em>(Leader of Spain, by the Grace of God), as he was called insistently by his entourage of hagiographers from 1939, the end of the Civil War.<\/p>\n\n\n\nAfter his death, the media put Franco\u2019s portrait on the front page and special issues described the physical decline and last days of the elderly dictator. The perspective was one of irreparable loss. Franco was presented as hero, saviour of the fatherland, providential man, the best statesman, an exemplary head of household, the sentinel of the west<\/em> \u2013 in reference to his position as anti-communist guardian \u2013 and other descriptions that compared him with historical figures such as Alexander the Great, Napoleon, Charles V, Cesar or Hercules.<\/p>\n\n\n\nThe social reaction to this historical event was polarised. We cannot provide exact numbers of those who were glad and those who began heartfelt mourning. The opposition to the Franco regime, Republican exiles, the entire labour and student movement, and millions of other Spanish people celebrated the death with quiet festivities in homes and clandestine meeting places. For them, this was a moment of hope with the start of a period that, from their perspective, would inevitably lead to the establishment of the democracy. On the other side were groups that supported Francoism, such as owners of big businesses, bankers and the military, as well as broad sections of society that were comfortable under the regime. Uncertainty seemed to be the only feeling shared by both positions, as all were aware that a time of profound changes was coming. Images of long queues of people waiting to file past the body show the interest in the figure of Franco, whether it was to pay respects or to ensure that he was dead, as many opponents stated. So the preliminary stages of the transition began, while Franco\u2019s regime came to an end.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
On the first anniversary of Franco\u2019s death, some of the newspapers with the largest circulation in Spain put the dictator\u2019s image on front pages tinged with nostalgia, mourning and evocation. Franco was presented as a man who had received a country at war \u2013 as if he had not contributed to the war\u2019s outbreak \u2013 who had given it the longest period of peace in national history. The repressive policies he had used to achieve this were not explained. The Spanish king and queen, Don Juan Carlos I and Do\u00f1a Sof\u00eda, presided over the official funeral service in the basilica of the Valle de los Ca\u00eddos. Meanwhile, in the Plaza de Oriente in Madrid, where Franco had often summoned the masses when he needed what were known as \u201cActos de afirmaci\u00f3n naciona<\/em>l\u201d (acts of national affirmation), pro-Franco groups organised a gathering in homage to his memory. From then on, the Confederaci\u00f3n Nacional de Excombatientes (National Confederation of Ex-Fighters, from Franco\u2019s army) along with Franco\u2019s family, members of the military, former ministers and well-known figures in the regime such as Blas Pi\u00f1ar or Jos\u00e9 Antonio Gir\u00f3n presided over commemorative ceremonies to cries of Franco, Franco, Franco<\/em>, singing of the Spanish Falange\u2019s anthem Cara al Sol<\/em>, and some violent acts in streets and bars in which bystanders were made to do the Fascist salute or sing the aforementioned anthem. At the gathering of 1976, El Pa\u00eds <\/em>newspaper counted around a hundred thousand participants, a number that dropped to around six thousand in 1978, one thousand five hundred in 1989 and the same number again in 2000. Although the figures have fallen, these gatherings have not disappeared. They reflect the persistence of far-right groups in the Spanish political spectrum during the years of democracy. <\/p>\n\n\n\nThe date of Franco\u2019s death, which came to be known as 20-N, continued to be a key day for gatherings of the far right. The acts of homage to the dictator, which always culminated with a mass at the Valle de los Ca\u00eddos and prayers in the military barracks, were transformed into a day of remembrance, but also a day of protest against the nascent democracy, lamentation for the disappearance of the dictator\u2019s political legacy and criticism of the new historical phase that was beginning to open up cautiously. The gatherings always included a display of pro-Franco marketing, such as caps, kerchiefs, flags, medals, keyrings, calendars and framed photographs of Franco. <\/p>\n\n\n\n
\u2026to colour<\/strong><\/h3>\n\n\n\nWith the arrival of the twenty-first century and the birth of the associative movement for the recovery of historical memory, the fate of the Valle de los Ca\u00eddos was put on the discussion table. Franco was the only dictator whose remains had survived in a mausoleum in a democratic country. The mausoleum had been constructed to enshrine the values of the dictatorship and glorify Franco\u2019s victory in the Civil War, the source of his legitimacy. He had died of old age, not killed in conflict, and his cadaver shared a burial place with the bodies of over thirty thousand people from the two armies that had fought in the war. The associations demanded an end to this painful situation in which victims were buried next to their main executioner. Political parties with parliamentary representation agreed to do something with the largest crypt in Europe. However, the decisions were postponed, especially during Mariano Rajoy\u2019s term in office (2011-2018), as he rescinded the budget set aside for compliance with the Ley de Memoria Hist\u00f3rica (Historical Memory Law, 2007). <\/p>\n\n\n\n
The new president of the government since June 2018, Pedro S\u00e1nchez, announced that one of his executive\u2019s measures would be to exhume Franco from the Valle de los Ca\u00eddos<\/em> (Valley of the Fallen), to meet a democratic obligation that had been adopted years ago. In February 2019, an order was approved to carry out the exhumation and transfer of the general\u2019s body to a place chosen by his family. However, Franco\u2019s grandchildren appealed, and the courts suspended the order. Finally, on 24 September, the Supreme Court endorsed the exhumation of Franco and his interment in the Mingorrubio cemetery, close to the Palace of El Pardo, which had been his usual residence. A month later, on 24 October, the funereal procedure took place before the eyes of millions of spectators who watched this historical moment from their homes.<\/p>\n\n\n\nBeyond the parliamentary debates and discussions of politicians before the media, an intense controversy emerged on Twitter between people of varying ages and profiles. Under the hashtags #exhumaci\u00f3nfranco <\/strong><\/em>(Franco exhumation), #elvallenosetoca<\/strong><\/em> (the valley shall remain) or #<\/em>unboxing<\/em>,<\/strong> opposing opinions were observed, as we will see below. From 31 March 2019, when the provisional suspension of the exhumation was in force, to 24 October, the date of its execution, we monitored the reaction on the internet. Over this period, activity, both for and against, depended on the progress of the events. On 4 June, when the Supreme Court paralysed the exhumation, the number of tweets reached 50,000 per day. On 24 September, when the same Court endorsed the exhumation, the number of daily tweets doubled. Finally, on 24 October, the day designated for the disinterment, the number of messages increased fivefold. In this last month, there was intense participation on Twitter about the preparations for the event, but also about Franco and his dictatorship.<\/p>\n\n\n\nIn the analysis of social networks, the social group against the exhumation, which identifies with right-wing and far right political parties, was found to have a strong, uniform structure of connection. In contrast, groups in favour were divided into subgroups around nuclei of associations for historical memory, left-wing political parties or people who wanted to express their opinion. <\/p>\n\n\n\n![\"\"](\"https:\/\/europeanmemories.net\/magazine\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/9\/2020\/12\/2-1024x591.jpg\")
Source: Monitoring of Twitter. Compiled by the authors.<\/strong><\/strong>
<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\n\n\n![\"\"](\"https:\/\/europeanmemories.net\/magazine\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/9\/2020\/12\/3.-1024x824.jpg\")
Source: Monitoring of Twitter. Compiled by the authors.<\/strong><\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\n\n\nIn the period between 22 and 26 October, the dates before and after the event, over a million tweets were posted. The division of opinions was not so radical because there was mass participation in which many users did not have a clear opinion, but their messages were widely shared. However, a clear separation can be seen between the far-right party VOX and its supporters compared to other groups. <\/p>\n\n\n\n![\"\"](\"https:\/\/europeanmemories.net\/magazine\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/9\/2020\/12\/4..jpg\")
Source: Monitoring of Twitter. Compiled by the authors<\/strong>
<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\n\n\nBetween the Supreme Court\u2019s ruling of suspension (4 June) and endorsement (24 September), the controversy was enriched by the appearance of a new actor: humour. On Twitter, sarcastic and ironic messages often circulate that ridicule all kinds of events and are sometimes on the limits of black humour. In the case of Franco\u2019s exhumation, humour came from the social bloc in favour of taking him out of the Valle. The messages swept up many users who would not have participated in the discussion otherwise. Much of this humorous content was expressed in the form of memes, some trivialising the situation, others making fun of the dictator himself. <\/p>\n\n\n\n
Regarding doubts about how the disinterment and reburial process would be carried out, various memes circulated that proposed solutions. One showed an image of the children from Steven Spielberg\u2019s famous film E.T. <\/em>(1982) transporting the dictator on their bicycle. <\/p>\n\n\n\n![\"\"](\"https:\/\/europeanmemories.net\/magazine\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/9\/2020\/12\/5..jpg\")
Source: Monitoring of Twitter.<\/strong><\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\n\n\n
After his death, the media put Franco\u2019s portrait on the front page and special issues described the physical decline and last days of the elderly dictator. The perspective was one of irreparable loss. Franco was presented as hero, saviour of the fatherland, providential man, the best statesman, an exemplary head of household, the sentinel of the west<\/em> \u2013 in reference to his position as anti-communist guardian \u2013 and other descriptions that compared him with historical figures such as Alexander the Great, Napoleon, Charles V, Cesar or Hercules.<\/p>\n\n\n\n The social reaction to this historical event was polarised. We cannot provide exact numbers of those who were glad and those who began heartfelt mourning. The opposition to the Franco regime, Republican exiles, the entire labour and student movement, and millions of other Spanish people celebrated the death with quiet festivities in homes and clandestine meeting places. For them, this was a moment of hope with the start of a period that, from their perspective, would inevitably lead to the establishment of the democracy. On the other side were groups that supported Francoism, such as owners of big businesses, bankers and the military, as well as broad sections of society that were comfortable under the regime. Uncertainty seemed to be the only feeling shared by both positions, as all were aware that a time of profound changes was coming. Images of long queues of people waiting to file past the body show the interest in the figure of Franco, whether it was to pay respects or to ensure that he was dead, as many opponents stated. So the preliminary stages of the transition began, while Franco\u2019s regime came to an end.<\/p>\n\n\n\n On the first anniversary of Franco\u2019s death, some of the newspapers with the largest circulation in Spain put the dictator\u2019s image on front pages tinged with nostalgia, mourning and evocation. Franco was presented as a man who had received a country at war \u2013 as if he had not contributed to the war\u2019s outbreak \u2013 who had given it the longest period of peace in national history. The repressive policies he had used to achieve this were not explained. The Spanish king and queen, Don Juan Carlos I and Do\u00f1a Sof\u00eda, presided over the official funeral service in the basilica of the Valle de los Ca\u00eddos. Meanwhile, in the Plaza de Oriente in Madrid, where Franco had often summoned the masses when he needed what were known as \u201cActos de afirmaci\u00f3n naciona<\/em>l\u201d (acts of national affirmation), pro-Franco groups organised a gathering in homage to his memory. From then on, the Confederaci\u00f3n Nacional de Excombatientes (National Confederation of Ex-Fighters, from Franco\u2019s army) along with Franco\u2019s family, members of the military, former ministers and well-known figures in the regime such as Blas Pi\u00f1ar or Jos\u00e9 Antonio Gir\u00f3n presided over commemorative ceremonies to cries of Franco, Franco, Franco<\/em>, singing of the Spanish Falange\u2019s anthem Cara al Sol<\/em>, and some violent acts in streets and bars in which bystanders were made to do the Fascist salute or sing the aforementioned anthem. At the gathering of 1976, El Pa\u00eds <\/em>newspaper counted around a hundred thousand participants, a number that dropped to around six thousand in 1978, one thousand five hundred in 1989 and the same number again in 2000. Although the figures have fallen, these gatherings have not disappeared. They reflect the persistence of far-right groups in the Spanish political spectrum during the years of democracy. <\/p>\n\n\n\n The date of Franco\u2019s death, which came to be known as 20-N, continued to be a key day for gatherings of the far right. The acts of homage to the dictator, which always culminated with a mass at the Valle de los Ca\u00eddos and prayers in the military barracks, were transformed into a day of remembrance, but also a day of protest against the nascent democracy, lamentation for the disappearance of the dictator\u2019s political legacy and criticism of the new historical phase that was beginning to open up cautiously. The gatherings always included a display of pro-Franco marketing, such as caps, kerchiefs, flags, medals, keyrings, calendars and framed photographs of Franco. <\/p>\n\n\n\n With the arrival of the twenty-first century and the birth of the associative movement for the recovery of historical memory, the fate of the Valle de los Ca\u00eddos was put on the discussion table. Franco was the only dictator whose remains had survived in a mausoleum in a democratic country. The mausoleum had been constructed to enshrine the values of the dictatorship and glorify Franco\u2019s victory in the Civil War, the source of his legitimacy. He had died of old age, not killed in conflict, and his cadaver shared a burial place with the bodies of over thirty thousand people from the two armies that had fought in the war. The associations demanded an end to this painful situation in which victims were buried next to their main executioner. Political parties with parliamentary representation agreed to do something with the largest crypt in Europe. However, the decisions were postponed, especially during Mariano Rajoy\u2019s term in office (2011-2018), as he rescinded the budget set aside for compliance with the Ley de Memoria Hist\u00f3rica (Historical Memory Law, 2007). <\/p>\n\n\n\n The new president of the government since June 2018, Pedro S\u00e1nchez, announced that one of his executive\u2019s measures would be to exhume Franco from the Valle de los Ca\u00eddos<\/em> (Valley of the Fallen), to meet a democratic obligation that had been adopted years ago. In February 2019, an order was approved to carry out the exhumation and transfer of the general\u2019s body to a place chosen by his family. However, Franco\u2019s grandchildren appealed, and the courts suspended the order. Finally, on 24 September, the Supreme Court endorsed the exhumation of Franco and his interment in the Mingorrubio cemetery, close to the Palace of El Pardo, which had been his usual residence. A month later, on 24 October, the funereal procedure took place before the eyes of millions of spectators who watched this historical moment from their homes.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Beyond the parliamentary debates and discussions of politicians before the media, an intense controversy emerged on Twitter between people of varying ages and profiles. Under the hashtags #exhumaci\u00f3nfranco <\/strong><\/em>(Franco exhumation), #elvallenosetoca<\/strong><\/em> (the valley shall remain) or #<\/em>unboxing<\/em>,<\/strong> opposing opinions were observed, as we will see below. From 31 March 2019, when the provisional suspension of the exhumation was in force, to 24 October, the date of its execution, we monitored the reaction on the internet. Over this period, activity, both for and against, depended on the progress of the events. On 4 June, when the Supreme Court paralysed the exhumation, the number of tweets reached 50,000 per day. On 24 September, when the same Court endorsed the exhumation, the number of daily tweets doubled. Finally, on 24 October, the day designated for the disinterment, the number of messages increased fivefold. In this last month, there was intense participation on Twitter about the preparations for the event, but also about Franco and his dictatorship.<\/p>\n\n\n\n In the analysis of social networks, the social group against the exhumation, which identifies with right-wing and far right political parties, was found to have a strong, uniform structure of connection. In contrast, groups in favour were divided into subgroups around nuclei of associations for historical memory, left-wing political parties or people who wanted to express their opinion. <\/p>\n\n\n\n In the period between 22 and 26 October, the dates before and after the event, over a million tweets were posted. The division of opinions was not so radical because there was mass participation in which many users did not have a clear opinion, but their messages were widely shared. However, a clear separation can be seen between the far-right party VOX and its supporters compared to other groups. <\/p>\n\n\n\n Between the Supreme Court\u2019s ruling of suspension (4 June) and endorsement (24 September), the controversy was enriched by the appearance of a new actor: humour. On Twitter, sarcastic and ironic messages often circulate that ridicule all kinds of events and are sometimes on the limits of black humour. In the case of Franco\u2019s exhumation, humour came from the social bloc in favour of taking him out of the Valle. The messages swept up many users who would not have participated in the discussion otherwise. Much of this humorous content was expressed in the form of memes, some trivialising the situation, others making fun of the dictator himself. <\/p>\n\n\n\n Regarding doubts about how the disinterment and reburial process would be carried out, various memes circulated that proposed solutions. One showed an image of the children from Steven Spielberg\u2019s famous film E.T. <\/em>(1982) transporting the dictator on their bicycle. <\/p>\n\n\n\n\u2026to colour<\/strong><\/h3>\n\n\n\n
<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\n\n\n
<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\n\n\n
![\"\"](\"https:\/\/europeanmemories.net\/magazine\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/9\/2020\/12\/6..jpg\")
![\"\"](\"https:\/\/europeanmemories.net\/magazine\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/9\/2020\/12\/7.-1024x797.jpg\")
![\"\"](\"https:\/\/europeanmemories.net\/magazine\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/9\/2020\/12\/tweets.png\")